News on Twitter

[NMP09] Readerly vs Writerly

An interesting discussion began today in New Media Perspectives following our introduction to Barthes‘ ideas regarding the readerly and writerly.

This overview shifted to a discussion of hypertext with a reading of Richard Pryll’s Lies (a work from 1994 that still stands as a great introduction to the idea of hypertext.)  This was followed by a more complex work (in terms of structure and visual design) entitled blindspot by Darcy Steinke.

Based on some of the discussions in class, here is a link to a hypertext that is a little different than what we have previously looked at: Six Sex Scenes by Adrienne Eisen.

We will continue our discussions on readerly, writerly, and hypertext on Wednesday.

2 comments to [NMP09] Readerly vs Writerly

  • This is an interesting perspective from an author’s point of view about the effect of the e-book on his creation. Myself as an older generation, I cannot see me without an actual paper book on my night table. As somebody said, I am part of the digital immigrant generation as opposite as my own kids, native digital generation:have never known a world without internet or computers.

    I still need sometimes to print on paper documents to read…I love the experience of a book: turn the pages, see how much is left to finish a chapter, read the back of the book for recommendation from others, etc. It is not the support (paper book) that I enjoy but the manipulative capability that ebooks don’t offer. Matters of preference, I guess.

    Still, I have to say that when an ebook will offer an enhanced experience stimulating my senses, imagination and creativity with music, smells, etc. It might become a whole different perspective. Beyond a more effective and economical physical support to storage a library of books : it might become an holistic adventure.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>